Command A: An Enterprise-Ready Large Language Model
In this report we describe the development of Command A, a powerful large language model purpose-built to excel at real-world enterprise use cases. Command A is an agent-optimised and multilingual-capable model, with support for 23 languages of global business, and a novel hybrid architecture balancing efficiency with top of the range performance. It offers best-in-class Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) capabilities with grounding and tool use to automate sophisticated business processes. These abilities are achieved through a decentralised training approach, including self-refinement algorithms and model merging techniques. We also include results for Command R7B which shares capability and architectural similarities to Command A. Weights for both models have been released for research purposes. This technical report details our original training pipeline and presents an extensive evaluation of our models across a suite of enterprise-relevant tasks and public benchmarks, demonstrating excellent performance and efficiency.
Introduction. Large Language Models (LLMs) are Artificial Intelligence (AI) models designed to understand and generate human-like text conditioned on the input they receive. Recent advancements have led to remarkable breakthroughs in their ability to comprehend and produce human language with unparalleled accuracy and fluency. This progress has been instrumental in their widespread adoption across various real-world and enterprise environments, where they significantly boost operational efficiency and deepen understanding. This technical report describes the development of Command A and Command R7B, two LLMs designed to excel in real-world enterprise settings. Both the 111B parameter Command A and Command R7B perform best-in-class across a suite of established benchmarks for their respective model sizes.
Discussion / Conclusion. This technical report detailed the development of Command A, shared extensive performance evaluations across many domains and languages, and shared additional results for Command R7B. Command A represents a significant advancement in LLMs for enterprise, achieving best-in-class performance across a wide range of tasks with optimal efficiency. Our models excel in enterprise-relevant tasks such as agentic workflows, multilingual understanding and generation, and instruction-following. Key innovations introduced include data and architectural optimisations, self-refinement algorithms, and a model merging-based approach that ensures expert-level performance across diverse capabilities within a single model. Command A outperforms comparable models in both efficiency and computational overhead, requiring fewer resources for serving, making it easy to deploy on-premises or in private cloud environments on just two A100 or H100 GPUs, and delivering tokens at a higher rate. The release of model weights under a non-commercial license further facilitates community-based exploration and research. Command A sets a new standard for LLMs in enterprise applications, balancing performance, efficiency, and versatility — and providing maximum performance for minimal compute.
Lines of inquiry this paper opens 24
Research framings built by reading the notes related to this paper — the questions it feeds into.
Do harness improvements generate capability gains independent of model scale?- What happens when different harnesses project the same model?
- What cognitive burdens should move from model parameters into harness infrastructure?
- Can harness evolution be redirected toward distilling transferable procedures instead?
- How do orthogonal adapter vectors avoid interference at scale?
- How do aligned LoRA adapters compose through parameter-space arithmetic?
- Does parameter composition work when adapter alignment is imperfect?
- Does base model strength determine adapter usefulness across users?
- What inner-shell user model fields should never leave the device?
- How much of a user model must be sent per request for effective personalization?
- Does small heterogeneous model architecture outperform large homogeneous pools economically?
- Do open model properties like customizability create net new misuse opportunities?
- Can different teams train specialist adapters that share one frozen base model?