Can a single model generate all modalities without external encoders?
Most multimodal systems rely on separate encoders for each modality. This research explores whether training a unified foundation model on discrete tokens across text, image, video, and speech can enable any-to-any generation without those external components.
Most multimodal LLMs are dual-modal (text + one other modality) and rely on external encoders with alignment modules — they understand non-text inputs but rarely generate them, and can't produce interleaved multimodal sequences. MIO addresses this by training on a mixture of discrete tokens across four modalities (text, image, video, speech) with causal multimodal modeling, through a four-stage process (alignment → interleaved → speech-enhanced pretraining → comprehensive SFT). The result is end-to-end, autoregressive, any-to-any understanding and generation in one model, with emergent abilities the dual-modal baselines lack: interleaved video-text generation and chain-of-visual-thought reasoning.
The keeper is the design point: tokenize every modality into a shared discrete vocabulary and model them with one causal objective — which unlocks interleaved cross-modal output and reasoning that staple-on encoder approaches can't produce.
This sits in the vault's multimodal-architecture thread as the discrete-token, any-to-any design point. It is the tokenizer-based ("Type-D") instantiation contrasted with encoder-based unified generation, and it complements Why do unified image generators fail on non-Latin scripts?: unified any-to-any generation still inherits the frequency-driven data-bias documented in Does multimodal zero-shot performance actually generalize or interpolate?.
Inquiring lines that read this note 4
This note is a source for these research framings, grouped by the broader line of inquiry each explores. Scan the bold lines of inquiry; follow any specific question forward.
Does learning articulatory physics explain speech communication superiority? Should GUI agents use structured UI perception instead of raw pixels? Does generative AI replace coordination with individual productivity?Related concepts in this collection 2
This note in its neighbourhood — explore the map, then jump to a related concept in the list below.
Click a node to walk · click center to open · click Open in graph to see this note in the full knowledge graph
-
Why do unified image generators fail on non-Latin scripts?
GPT-4o excels at multimodal generation across 20+ tasks, but systematically fails to render non-Latin scripts and underrepresented cultures accurately. What explains this specific failure mode in otherwise capable systems?
any-to-any generation still inherits data-distribution bias
-
Does multimodal zero-shot performance actually generalize or interpolate?
Explores whether multimodal models like CLIP truly generalize to unseen concepts or whether their impressive performance merely reflects memorization of frequently-seen concepts during pretraining.
the frequency law that bounds even unified token-based multimodal models
Related papers in this collection 8
Papers most semantically related to this note, ranked by cosine similarity in the embedding space.
- MIO: A Foundation Model on Multimodal Tokens
- The Evolution of Multimodal Model Architectures
- Beyond Language Modeling: An Exploration of Multimodal Pretraining
- Emerging Properties in Unified Multimodal Pretraining
- Learn from your own latents and not from tokens: A sample-complexity theory
- A Survey on Diffusion Language Models
- MM-LLMs: Recent Advances in MultiModal Large Language Models
- No "Zero-Shot" Without Exponential Data: Pretraining Concept Frequency Determines Multimodal Model Performance
Original note title
an any-to-any foundation model on discrete multimodal tokens enables interleaved generation and chain-of-visual-thought