Editing-Based SQL Query Generation for Cross-Domain Context-Dependent Questions

Paper · Source
Question Answering and Search

We focus on the cross-domain contextdependent text-to-SQL generation task. Based on the observation that adjacent natural language questions are often linguistically dependent and their corresponding SQL queries tend to overlap, we utilize the interaction history by editing the previous predicted query to improve the generation quality. Our editing mechanism views SQL as sequences and reuses generation results at the token level in a simple manner. It is flexible to change individual tokens and robust to error propagation. Furthermore, to deal with complex table structures in different domains, we employ an utterance-table encoder and a table-aware decoder to incorporate the context of the user utterance and the table schema. We evaluate our approach on the SParC dataset and demonstrate the benefit of editing compared with the state-of-the-art baselines which generate SQL from scratch. Our code is available at https://github.com/ ryanzhumich/sparc_atis_pytorch.

Introduction. Generating SQL queries from user utterances is an important task to help end users acquire information from databases. In a real-world application, users often access information in a multi-turn interaction with the system by asking a sequence of related questions. As the interaction proceeds, the user often makes reference to the relevant mentions in the history or omits previously conveyed information assuming it is known to the system. Therefore, in the context-dependent scenario, the contextual history is crucial to understand the follow-up questions from users, and the system often needs to reproduce partial sequences generated in previous turns. Recently, Suhr et al. (2018) proposes a context-dependent text-to-SQL model including an interaction-level encoder and an attention mechanism over previous utterances. To reuse what has been generated, they propose to copy complete segments from the previous query.

Lines of inquiry this paper opens 24

Research framings built by reading the notes related to this paper — the questions it feeds into.

How does AI-generated content affect visibility and discourse in digital platforms? What systematic biases emerge in AI shopping agents' decision-making? How can recommendation systems balance individual and population-level goals? What conversation mechanics enable genuine human-AI communicative participation? How should conversational agents balance proactive goal-pursuit with user autonomy? Do AI explanations represent actual model reasoning or constructed post-hoc narratives? Do language models learn underlying linguistic structure or merely surface patterns? How can parameter sparsity improve interpretability while maintaining model capability? Do language models truly understand their encoded knowledge or merely retrieve patterns? How does verifier integration affect the generation-verification gap? What determines whether visible reasoning traces improve task performance? Can we reliably distinguish AI-generated from human-written text? When and why does aggregating multiple reasoning samples improve performance? Does generative AI replace coordination with individual productivity? Why does separating planning from execution enhance reasoning performance? Does reasoning architecture matter more than model scale?