Editing-Based SQL Query Generation for Cross-Domain Context-Dependent Questions

Paper · Source
Question Answering and Search

We focus on the cross-domain contextdependent text-to-SQL generation task. Based on the observation that adjacent natural language questions are often linguistically dependent and their corresponding SQL queries tend to overlap, we utilize the interaction history by editing the previous predicted query to improve the generation quality. Our editing mechanism views SQL as sequences and reuses generation results at the token level in a simple manner. It is flexible to change individual tokens and robust to error propagation. Furthermore, to deal with complex table structures in different domains, we employ an utterance-table encoder and a table-aware decoder to incorporate the context of the user utterance and the table schema. We evaluate our approach on the SParC dataset and demonstrate the benefit of editing compared with the state-of-the-art baselines which generate SQL from scratch. Our code is available at https://github.com/ ryanzhumich/sparc_atis_pytorch.

Introduction. Generating SQL queries from user utterances is an important task to help end users acquire information from databases. In a real-world application, users often access information in a multi-turn interaction with the system by asking a sequence of related questions. As the interaction proceeds, the user often makes reference to the relevant mentions in the history or omits previously conveyed information assuming it is known to the system. Therefore, in the context-dependent scenario, the contextual history is crucial to understand the follow-up questions from users, and the system often needs to reproduce partial sequences generated in previous turns. Recently, Suhr et al. (2018) proposes a context-dependent text-to-SQL model including an interaction-level encoder and an attention mechanism over previous utterances. To reuse what has been generated, they propose to copy complete segments from the previous query.

Lines of inquiry this paper opens 24

Research framings built by reading the notes related to this paper — the questions it feeds into.

How can language models sustain linguistic synchrony and intersubjectivity during dialogue? How should conversational agents balance goal-driven initiative with user control? How should dialogue recommender systems manage conversation history and state? How does AI assistance affect human cognitive development and reasoning autonomy? Which computational strategies best support reasoning in language models? Do language models learn genuine linguistic structure or just surface patterns? Why does verification consistently lag behind AI generation? How do prompt structure and constraints affect model instruction reliability? How do neural networks separate factual knowledge from reasoning abilities? What makes specific clarifying questions more effective than generic ones? What memory architectures best support persistent reasoning across extended interactions? What dimensions of recommendation quality do standard metrics miss? How should memory consolidation strategies shape agent performance over time? How should retrieval systems optimize for multi-step reasoning during inference? What role does compression play in language model capability and generalization? Why do multi-turn conversations degrade AI intent and coherence? Can single-axis benchmarks accurately predict agent deployment success? How does AI-generated content transformation affect public discourse quality?