Compute accounts for the majority of expenses of AI companies

Paper · Source
Foundation Models

Source: Epoch AI (Luke Emberson, Yafah Edelman) · 2026-02-04

Across three AI companies where we can make estimates, compute is the dominant expense: R&D and inference compute together make up 54% to 62% of costs. Despite AI labs offering some of the highest salaries in tech, spending on staff accounts for less than 25% of total spending.

Currently, spending at each of these labs is 2-3x higher than revenue. While Minimax and Z.ai both indicate that they will remain unprofitable for the foreseeable future, Anthropic expects to become profitable by 2028.

We break down spending at 3 notable AI companies where data availability permits: Anthropic, Minimax, and Z.ai. Spending is categorized into R&D compute, non-R&D compute, staffing, and other, although for Anthropic we aren’t able to separate staffing expenses.

We report spending categories by the share of total operating expenses, and include non-cash expenses like stock-based compensation.

Our data sources differ by company. For Anthropic, data comes from reporting at The Information:

As of December 2025, Anthropic’s “optimistic” projections were for $5.2 billion in EBITDA losses on $4.5B of revenue for 2025, suggesting total expenses of $9.7B. Since these figures were near year-end, we expect them to be close to final reports.

In the same article, they report that Anthropic spent $4.1B training its models in 2025, which we take to be R&D compute costs. It also reports a gross margin of 40%, suggesting that the $4.5B of revenue involved $2.7B in inference compute expense.

Minimax and Z.ai each made IPOs in January 2026, which required the public release of detailed financial documents. These documents provided detailed information on revenues and spending across categories.

Note that when tabulating total expenses, we include operating expenses and the cost of goods and services, but omit other line items like the cost of financing and on-paper changes in the fair value of financial liabilities.

Second-hand reports of financial statements carry a degree of uncertainty over the exact financial accounting being used. For that reason, our estimates for Anthropic are somewhat speculative.

Lines of inquiry this paper opens 24

Research framings built by reading the notes related to this paper — the questions it feeds into.

What fundamentally drives AI inference pricing and cost decline patterns? What cost drivers and infrastructure choices characterize frontier AI training? How does offloading cognition to AI assistance affect learning retention?