LeWorldModel: Stable End-to-End Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture from Pixels
Joint Embedding Predictive Architectures (JEPAs) offer a compelling framework for learning world models in compact latent spaces, yet existing methods remain fragile, relying on complex multi-term losses, exponential moving averages, pretrained encoders, or auxiliary supervision to avoid representation collapse. In this work, we introduce LeWorldModel (LeWM), the first JEPA that trains stably end-to-end from raw pixels using only two loss terms: a next-embedding prediction loss and a regularizer enforcing Gaussian-distributed latent embeddings. This reduces tunable loss hyperparameters from six to one compared to the only existing end-to-end alternative. With 15M parameters trainable on a single GPU in a few hours, LeWM plans up to 48× faster than foundation-model-based world models while remaining competitive across diverse 2D and 3D control tasks. Beyond control, we show that LeWM’s latent space encodes meaningful physical structure through probing of physical quantities. Surprise evaluation confirms that the model reliably detects physically implausible events.
Introduction. A central goal of artificial intelligence is to develop agents that acquire skills across diverse tasks and environments using a single, unified learning paradigm—one that operates directly from sensory inputs of its surroundings–without hand-engineered state representations or domain-specific calibration. Vision is ideally suited for this aim: cameras are inexpensive and scalable, and learning from pixels enables fully end-to-end training from raw sensory input to action [1]. World Models (WMs) are a powerful family of methods [2] that learn to predict the consequences of actions in the environment. When successful, WMs allows agents to plan and to improve themselves solely form their model of the world, i.e., in imagination space. This is particularly valuable in the offline setting, where agents must learn from fixed datasets without environment interaction—leveraging the model to generate synthetic experience and evaluate counterfactual action sequences [3, 4]. A recent popular approach for learning world models is the Joint Embedding Predictive Architecture (JEPA) [5].
Discussion / Conclusion. This work introduced LeWorldModel (LeWM), a stable end-to-end method for learning latent world models of environments. LeWM is a Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture that uses an encoder to map image observations into a latent space and a predictor that models temporal dynamics in the embedding space by predicting future embeddings conditioned on actions. Across a variety of continuous control environments and using only raw pixel inputs, LeWM outperforms previous approaches in data efficiency, planning time, training time, and stability while maintaining competitive final task performance. The stability and simplicity of training arise from explicitly encouraging latent embeddings to follow an isotropic Gaussian distribution to avoid collapse. Overall, LeWM provides a scalable alternative to existing latent world model methods, offering principled training dynamics alongside interpretable and emergent representation properties. Limitations & Future Work. Despite these promising results, several limitations highlight important research directions.
Lines of inquiry this paper opens 17
Research framings built by reading the notes related to this paper — the questions it feeds into.
How do neural networks develop compositional and modular internal structure?- What physical structure does a Gaussian-regularized latent space actually encode?
- What prevents representation collapse in latent-prediction world models like JEPA?
- What makes regularization an implicit factor in embedding geometry?
- Can generative reconstruction preserve latent manifold structure better than geometric compression?
- Why do foundation models develop heuristics instead of world models?
- How do training objectives shape what a world model actually learns?
- Can a world model have rich representations without adequate data coverage?
- Why does integrating world models with decision-making systems matter?
- Why must world models be nested rather than flat and uniform?
- Do LLMs need world models to make accurate predictions?
- What distinguishes task-specific heuristics from genuine world models?
- What's the difference between representing world facts and generating world mechanisms?
- Does next-state prediction alone build mechanistic world models or just sophisticated interpolation?
- Why has agent research prioritized policy over world model development?
- What are the five inseparable design choices when building world models?
- Can world models simulate actionable possibilities instead of just predicting next states?
- Can economic world models explain outcomes or only predict them?