SkillRL: Evolving Agents via Recursive Skill-Augmented Reinforcement Learning

Paper · arXiv 2602.08234 · Published February 9, 2026
Reinforcement LearningLLM AgentsLLM MemoryTraining and Fine-Tuning

Large Language Model (LLM) agents have shown stunning results in complex tasks, yet they often operate in isolation, failing to learn from past experiences. Existing memory-based methods primarily store raw trajectories, which are often redundant and noise-heavy. This prevents agents from extracting high-level, reusable behavioral patterns that are essential for generalization. In this paper, we propose SkillRL, a framework that bridges the gap between raw experience and policy improvement through automatic skill discovery and recursive evolution. Our approach introduces an experience-based distillation mechanism to build a hierarchical skill library SkillBank, an adaptive retrieval strategy for general and task-specific heuristics, and a recursive evolution mechanism that allows the skill library to co-evolve with the agent's policy during reinforcement learning.

We argue that these approaches miss a crucial insight: effective experience transfer requires abstraction. Human experts do not memorize every action in every situation; instead, they develop skills, compact and reusable strategies that capture the essence of how to accomplish specific subtasks. Inspired by this observation, we propose SkillRL, a framework that bridges the gap between raw experience and efficient policy improvement through automatic skill discovery and recursive skill evolution. SkillRL first introduces an experience-based skill distillation mechanism, which gathers diverse trajectories from environment rollouts and applies differential processing: successful episodes are preserved as demonstrations, while failed ones are synthesized into concise failure lessons to mitigate context noise. Secondly, we transform these experiences into a hierarchical skill library SkillBank, differentiating between general skills for universal strategic guidance and task-specific skills for task-level heuristics.

Unlike previous memory-augmented RL which treats memory as a static or auxiliary source, recent trends suggest that the key to efficient experience transfer lies in abstraction. Our work builds on this by treating the skill library as a dynamic component that co-evolves with the agent's policy, utilizing RL to refine structured skills through recursive failure analysis. While RL is widely used to align LLMs or improve reasoning via rule-based verifiers, applying it to agentic skills remains challenging due to sparse rewards and long horizons. Memory mechanisms in agents have become a cornerstone of agent design, with early systems utilizing a static RAG paradigm or storing raw trajectories as few-shot examples. However, raw trajectories are token-heavy and contain significant redundancy and noise, which can lead to performance degradation. Current research has moved toward self-improving memory, distilling interactions into higher-level insights or procedural tips.

We introduced SkillRL, a framework for skill-augmented reinforcement learning in LLM agents. By distilling raw trajectories into compact, reusable skills and enabling dynamic skill evolution during training, SkillRL achieves state-of-the-art performance on ALFWorld and WebShop while using substantially less context than memory-based approaches. Our work demonstrates that the abstraction from experience to skill is a powerful principle for building capable, sample-efficient agents.

Lines of inquiry this paper opens 24

Research framings built by reading the notes related to this paper — the questions it feeds into.

How do aggregate reward models systematically exclude minority user preferences? What memory abstraction level best enables agent knowledge reuse? How should we design LLM systems to maintain alignment and control? What memory architectures best support persistent reasoning across extended interactions? How should agents balance memory condensation to optimize context efficiency? How do multi-agent systems achieve genuine cooperation and reasoning? Why do continual learning scenarios trigger catastrophic forgetting and interference? How should models express uncertainty rather than forced confident answers? How can AI agents autonomously learn and transfer skills across tasks? Does self-reflection enable models to reliably correct their errors? How should memory consolidation strategies shape agent performance over time? How does AI adoption affect human skill development and labor equality? Can alternative training methods improve on supervised fine-tuning for language models? What coordination failures limit multi-agent LLM systems as they scale? Does externalizing cognitive work and state improve agent reliability? Does fine-tuning modify underlying model capabilities or only behavioral outputs? How can conversational AI maintain consistent personas across conversations? Can AI-generated outputs constitute genuine knowledge or valid claims?