AutoCBT: An Autonomous Multi-agent Framework for Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Psychological Counseling
online automated counseling offers a potential solution for those hesitant to seek help due to feelings of shame. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) is an essential and widely used approach in psychological counseling. The advent of large language models (LLMs) and agent technology enables automatic CBT diagnosis and treatment. However, current LLM-based CBT systems use agents with a fixed structure, limiting their self-optimization capabilities, or providing hollow, unhelpful suggestions due to redundant response patterns. In this work, we utilize Quora-like1 and YiXinLi2 single-round consultation models to build a general agent framework that generates high-quality responses for single-turn psychological consultation scenarios. We use a bilingual dataset to evaluate the quality of single-response consultations generated by each framework. Then, we incorporate dynamic routing and supervisory mechanisms inspired by real psychological counseling to construct a CBT-oriented autonomous multi-agent framework, demonstrating its general applicability.
posits that individuals experiencing emotional or psychological problems often exhibit logical errors, such as catastrophizing, labeling, or minimizing positive affirmations. These logical errors, also referred to as thinking errors, can distort an individual’s perception of their situation, experiences, or personality, hinder daily functioning, and reduce their quality of life (Hofmann, 2011).
AutoCBT incorporates a routing mechanism and memory mechanism to enhance the autonomous ability of each agent. Each message generated by AutoCBT undergoes a structured process of reasoning and editing to meet specific requirements. From the perspective of CBT, AutoCBT allows for more flexible topology adaptation as therapeutic techniques evolve, and we also demonstrate its efficacy in other purely prompt-based psychological counseling framework.
Upon receiving the original user question, it will forward the message based on professional judgment and seek extra information from different supervisor agents, until the counsellor agent has sufficient confidence to answer the user’s question.
Generally speaking, there will be five different
types of strategies which are defined as following:
- [LOOPBACK] Loop back, continue with the
statement.
[UNICAST] Unicast, send to a communicable agent.
[MULTICAST] Multicast, send to several
communicable agents.
- [BROADCAST] Broadcast, send to all communicable
agents.
- [ENDCAST] Terminated casting, end communication
with the specified agent.
Lines of inquiry this paper opens 24
Research framings built by reading the notes related to this paper — the questions it feeds into.
Why do LLMs excel at generating but assessing content poorly? Does AI ideation collapse diversity despite appearing novel? Can human psychological models explain how LLMs actually reason? Can peer review policies effectively prevent undisclosed LLM use? How can we ensure benchmarks measure genuine progress rather than artifacts? Do relational factors like alliance and empathy determine AI therapy outcomes?- Why do therapists and patients report misaligned perceptions of the working relationship?
- What other therapy constructs could be measured from transcripts using this approach?
- How does automated transcript analysis compare to patient self-report on engagement?
- Can real-time therapist feedback improve outcomes using computational alliance measurement?
- How does turn-level working alliance inference enable real-time therapist feedback?
- How do bond scores predict actual therapy outcomes in digital interventions?
- Can real-time pronoun feedback improve therapist training outcomes?
- Do conversational AI systems overuse first-person pronouns in therapy settings?
- What makes clinical theory grounding more effective than pattern matching alone?
- Can synchrony metrics automatically evaluate the quality of therapeutic AI conversations?
- How should therapeutic chatbots optimize for presence instead of technique?
- Can embodied agents overcome the LLM skill gap in therapy outcomes?
- Can AI feedback help struggling counselors improve their therapeutic relationships?
- Does text-only interaction make measuring therapeutic alliance more difficult?