TREC iKAT 2023: A Test Collection for Evaluating Conversational and Interactive Knowledge Assistants

Conversational information seeking has evolved rapidly in the last few years with the development of Large Language Models (LLMs), providing the basis for interpreting and responding in a naturalistic manner to user requests. The extended TREC Interactive Knowledge Assistance Track (iKAT) collection aims to enable researchers to test and evaluate their Conversational Search Agent (CSA). The collection contains a set of 36 personalized dialogues over 20 different topics each coupled with a Personal Text Knowledge Base (PTKB) that defines the bespoke user personas. A total of 344 turns with approximately 26,000 passages are provided as assessments on relevance, as well as additional assessments on generated responses over four key dimensions: relevance, completeness, groundedness, and naturalness. The collection challenges CSAs to efficiently navigate diverse personal contexts, elicit pertinent persona information, and employ context for relevant conversations. The integration of a PTKB and the emphasis on decisional search tasks contribute to the uniqueness of this test collection, making it an essential benchmark for advancing research in conversational and interactive knowledge assistants.
Introduction. Conversational information seeking provides a natural and intuitive way for users to interact and discover relevant information through dialogue with an agent [4, 18]. With the advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) [10], access to Conversational Search Agents (CSAs) has become a reality (e.g., BingChat, Bard, BlenderBot, etc.). Moreover, the underlying technology has become sufficiently accessible, to afford the wide-scale research and development of such agents. However, resources to evaluate CSAs are currently limited. While numerous test collections and resources exist to test LLMs over a variety of different tasks, the conversational information-seeking task presents numerous varied and complex evaluation challenges [2, 19] for a number of reasons. This means that when a CSA is responding to a request (in the context of the conversation), the same request (question) might yield considerably different responses (and answers), based on what has been previously uttered, and be contingent on the user’s preferences.
Discussion / Conclusion. We introduce the iKAT resources, which build on the foundations established by TREC iKAT 2023. The iKAT resources allow researchers to assess conversational information seeking across various personas, distinguishing our test collection from others like SQuAD and CAsT. The unique aspect of our resource is its emphasis on handling personalized and complex conversations, which necessitate advanced reasoning and the effective use of personal knowledge graphs to generate relevant responses. Looking ahead, we aim to expand this resource to develop a more adaptable and scalable framework for evaluating personalized conversational agents across a broader array of topics and personas.
Lines of inquiry this paper opens 24
Research framings built by reading the notes related to this paper — the questions it feeds into.
Does pretraining quality determine the ceiling for reinforcement learning gains?- How does baseline capability level affect RL improvement ceiling?
- What role does natural language play in breaking reinforcement learning performance plateaus?
- Does task ordering affect multi-task reinforcement learning outcomes?
- Why do overtrained domains show different RL training outcomes than novel tasks?
- What training duration is actually needed for RL to expand capabilities?
- What makes a task at the edge of competence optimal for RL?
- Does the reinforcement learning improvement rate depend on model initialization?
- Why do next-turn reward objectives fail to encourage multi-turn goal progress?
- How do we measure progress without confusing it with task completion?
- Does RL refine existing knowledge or discover entirely new capabilities?
- What distinguishes RL that creates new capabilities from RL that merely teaches timing?