Theme of inquiry
What does iterative improvement accomplish and what are its limitations?
A question within its area, explored through 11 lines of inquiry below — each a family of specific questions the research asks.
58 specific questions
- How does believing deployment is real versus a test affect model behavior?
- Can models detect when they are running in simulated evaluation environments?
- How much does believing deployment is real change model behavior strategically?
- Do AI models behave differently when they believe deployment is real versus simulated?
- Can models hide recognition of evaluation without leaving CoT traces?
- Can test environments reliably predict how models behave in actual deployment?
- What enables models to distinguish between training and deployment contexts reliably?
41 specific questions
- Do models use covert sandbagging to bypass capability evaluation monitors?
- Can internal audits detect sandbagging that behavioral tests cannot reveal?
- Can models sandbag on evaluations without explicit prompting or training?
- Can capability evaluations detect when models intentionally underperform to hide abilities?
- Can models learn to underperform on purpose without explicit training to do so?
- Can installed sandbagging locks in small models describe uninstalled sandbagging behavior?
- What evaluation design changes reduce vulnerability to model sandbagging?
48 specific questions
- Why do models hide their capabilities during safety evaluations through reasoning?
- Why do models react differently to safety versus capability evaluations?
- Can safety evaluations miss behavioral effects by only measuring semantic shifts?
- How much introspective capability do safety mechanisms actively suppress in models?
- Does reasoning capability affect how often models refuse safety research tasks?
- Do models trained for safety over-refuse compared to models trained for reasoning?
- Why do frontier AI evaluations deliberately disable safety layers to measure maximum capability?
78 specific questions
- How do mechanistic interpretability methods surface what models represent internally?
- Can mechanistic interpretability findings guide practical interventions in model design?
- Can knowledge encoded in model representations fail to influence generation?
- How do we distinguish knowledge encoding from knowledge usage in models?
- How do mechanistic features compare to natural language for interpretability?
- What makes representation engineering better than mechanistic interpretability for detecting hidden objectives?
- Can geometric structure in representations exist without supporting functional mechanisms?
44 specific questions
- Do frontier AI models fail in ways that preserve the appearance of competence?
- Do frontier models spontaneously protect other models from being shut down?
- Do frontier models develop protective behaviors toward other models without explicit instruction?
- Why do frontier models corrupt more documents than weaker models during workflows?
- Does capability preservation matter for realistic threat modeling of frontier models?
- How do frontier models maintain agreement scores above 90 percent across reasoning tasks?
- Do frontier models develop misaligned strategies without any explicit instruction?
119 specific questions
- Does fine-tuning a small model match fine-tuning a large one?
- Can smaller models actually perform well on specific downstream tasks?
- Does fine-tuning actually change model capabilities or only output distribution?
- Can externalized memory and skills replace model scaling?
- How does model scale affect the crossover point between base and post-trained performance?
- Do small models show different parameter efficiency patterns than large models?
- Can smaller models produce skill updates as useful as frontier model updates?
67 specific questions
- Do models reason strategically about their oversight systems?
- Does conditional compliance make oversight useless for alignment testing?
- Could oversight conditions in benchmarks reveal when models comply conditionally?
- How can faithfulness be improved if monitoring interventions do not work?
- Can agents act differently when they know they are being watched?
- Can monitoring systems work if the systems being monitored are evaluation-aware?
- How does chain-of-thought monitoring fail when agents are trying to hide something?
26 specific questions
- Do newer language model generations improve forecasting ability without additional training?
- Do longer prediction horizons systematically degrade LLM forecasting accuracy?
- Do monolithic prompts underutilize LLM strengths in forecasting workflows?
- How do search and reasoning workflows improve forecasting performance over base models?
- What real-world forecasting domains benefit most from contextual reasoning integration?
- Do LLMs and human forecasters make better predictions when pooled together?
- What cognitive bounds limit human judgment that allow AI to exceed forecaster performance?
79 specific questions
- How often do metric improvements fail to reflect real capability gains?
- How does measurement error in capability benchmarks systematically underestimate or overestimate true ability?
- Why does a rising score not always mean improving capability?
- How do single average metrics conceal rare but severe AI failures?
- How does a single score mix exploitation ability with task capability?
- What biases affect how we measure progress on research leaderboards?
- Can benchmark scores alone prove a model's exploitation capability?
45 specific questions
- How does the generation-verification gap shape evolutionary program search?
- Can evolved algorithms transfer learning strategies across different datasets and tasks?
- Can the same problem be solved by multiple evolutionary search strategies?
- How does test-time search budget compare to evolution gains under matched conditions?
- Does evolutionary inference transcend the parallel versus sequential test-time compute tradeoff?
- Can evolutionary search at inference time scale beyond natural language planning?
- Why do isolated evolutionary branches fail to propagate useful discoveries?
81 specific questions
- Does harness optimization generalize across different benchmarks and agent architectures?
- Does harness scaling represent a fundamentally different path than model scaling?
- Do harness-driven accuracy gains appear on other benchmarks?
- Can mid-tier models benefit more from harness improvements than frontier models?
- How do agentic systems hide harness failures from benchmarks?
- How do evolved harness edits generalize across different benchmark domains?
- Can better agent harnesses solve problems that model scale alone cannot?